Archive for the Memoire Category

Gear Lust

Posted in A Day in the Life, Memoire, Perception with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 12, 2015 by swampmessiah

Sooner or later I’d have to delve into smut. I can’t live without it.

In these high tech times gear lust is the disease of almost all artists in almost all media, though it’s not always a gadget lust. Just like in the world of a more organic, physiologically rooted smut (I love that word, a favorite condemnation by my grandfather and a charming song by Tom Lehrer), we have hardware and software. I find the hard variety is more addicting.

(If you want a serious exploration of gear lust there are articles at Pink Noise that are more enlightening than anything I have to say on the subject. It seems to be a guy thing, just like the gonadal variety. I would also direct you to The Redundant Male by John Gribbin for more insight as to why this might be. Here, I’m merely confessing my sins, maybe even flaunting them, and maybe gloating about them. I am, perhaps cowed and shamed but not repentant.)

Decades ago, when I was merely drawing and painting, my desires were rather weak and inexpensive. Leads for my lead holder, new paint brushes, copal medium, a few yards of canvas or sheets of paper.  Switching from oil to acrylic skewed the details a little but, basically, it was the same limitation of temptations. I still like to go down the street to linger in the aisles of Wet Paint the way other men like to wander around Victoria’s Secret. (Pardon, I just stumbled onto the strangest online museum for lead holders. It was my tool of choice, something I picked up when I was a student of architectural drafting in the mid-1970s. In recent decades it’s been hard to find a good lead holder. Except for the grip they are made of plastic now. My primary lead holder, purchased in June 1975, is all metal. It feels good just to have it rolling between my fingers…and that’s an essential technique with a lead holder, rolling it, to keep the tip fairly symmetrical. Let me put up a sample of crosshatching with graphite in a lead holder, a portrait of Aldous Huxley from a time when I couldn’t find any postcards of him (that’s my idea of a domestic art gallery, postcards pinned to the wall).)

A portrait of Aldous Huxley copied out of a biography of him. Crosshatched graphite with touches of white acrylic paint, maybe some chalk and india ink. Approximately 4"x6" on either Rieves BFK or Stonehenge. Early 1990s?

A portrait of Aldous Huxley copied out of a biography of him. Crosshatched graphite with touches of white acrylic paint, maybe some chalk and india ink. Approximately 4″x6″ on either Rieves BFK or Stonehenge. Early 1990s?

 

In recent years I fantasize about getting a Wacom tablet or an iPad with an Adobe pen. The truth is, I wouldn’t use either gizmo. I really have no interest in drawing or painting. It’s that illusion gear gives that if you just had that one thing, that one vital instrument, you would be able to move on, you would overcome your creative paralysis to become inspired. The advertisers really don’t want to point out that their product might actually be more of a distraction than an inspiration. What will happen: as you’re learning to use the new gadget you’ll scribble and doodle and produce something. On the very rare occasion it might even be a keeper (or seller). Typically it’s nothing. Worst of all, playing with the thing has kept you from life experiences that might have triggered a meaningful creativity. But, you know, these things look so cool that I think I have to have them. I am providing links so you’ll share my feelings. The internet makes it easy for us to go down together.

I would say writing has had very little to tempt me beyond the cost of a computer. I think real writers can fetishize their craft and playthings as well as anyone else. But me? When I first began writing in the mid-1970s it was a Bic ballpoint pen (blue) and narrow ruled paper (I’ll post a self-portrait done with those same tools in a minute—they elicit so little gear lust I have no choice but to call them tools). I did have a refurbished manual office typewriter that, in my mind, was so high tech I remember it being an electric. It was a gadget with so little appeal—the near impossibility of editing either with pen or typewriter—that I gave up on writing in the late-1980s until I bought a word processor in 1992 or 1993. I can’t say that did much to wet my more lurid appetites, either, for bigger and better, for more display or memory, but it made editing easy enough that I returned to the word with a vengeance.

Self-portrait in blue ballpoint pen on ruled note paper. I used the same tools for writing. Circa 1983.

Self-portrait in blue ballpoint pen on ruled note paper. I used the same tools for writing. Circa 1983.

 

Computers… Writing on a computer, per se, is not the steamy process that one could really hope for. My daughter might disagree since she’s gotten Scrivener. I had Microsoft Works and then Office. In recent years I’ve used Open Office to open any Word documents and WordPad for basic rich text files. I can imagine going to an office supply store and finding more titillating objects of the hardware variety. Maybe some expensive fountain pens (or even gel pens) and some creamy smooth bond or the rippling sensual delight laid finish paper. How about real vellum and a quill? I see writers need not be immune to gear lust but they might not find satisfaction on a computer.

The two temptations I have found in computerland are WordPress and two Adobe products, InDesign and Muse, all of which are publishing options. There is something very lurid about making my words available to others. I suppose it’s a form of indecent exposure or some similar public ritual. I would describe my actual relationship with Adobe products, which are very expensive for someone who doesn’t really do much with them, as the equivalent of someone with little money, almost no spare time, and a severe inability of staying awake after work…holding onto an apartment in the hope of using it for an illicit rendezvous or housing a mistress. The software fantasy of living the life of a gentleman, eh?

Photography, a seriously gear obsessed field, is largely outside my experience. Second only to cinematography and audio recording (unless you’re planning to build your own space ship…now those guys have a jones). I can get by with a cheap digital with a good zoom and macro. And Photo Shop and Lightroom (a $50 per month subscription to Adobe’s Creative Cloud supplies you with just about every media related software thrill you could want).

But recording…

All you really need is a good microphone, a good preamp, and, if you’re recording digitally, a good converter. And something to record to. This could total less than $2000, including the cost of the computer, and be as exciting as a fork and spoon at dinner. For me the things I need most, already mentioned, are the least appealing. Professionals will not agree. My Røde NT-1 is totally inadequate, like a bikini ad in a biker magazine. They want a Neumann U-47. They want serious gear porn. They want something that could cost more than a home renovation. But they want it real, like naturally bosom stars rather than those with prosthetic implants (yes, in that business it should be considered a prosthetic). They want the car James Bond drives because they want the babe Bond screws, and they want everyone to see what they’re getting. I lean more toward pity than envy.

I think I went through a period of cruising the internet and magazines looking for the most luscious software. The false promises of the industry cured me of that. The compatibility issues and constant need to upgrade both operating system and program, combined with the lack of continued support of beloved instruments—something inside me was killed. I’m now hollow. Though I still use software instruments, having neither the space or money to go hardware, and though I still admire the beauty of some of them, I’m only going through the motions. Stroking my MIDI keyboard while the monitor is open to Reaktor no longer produces a thrill. But it’s not just the sensual thrill that’s gone. I think there was more than basic lust. I think I had fallen head over heels, the way a rube does when he sees his first stripper on the stage, with things that were not meant to live up to their promises. (Two of my favorite software instruments illustrated below. Native Instruments’ Pro-53, long ago discontinued, has luscious sounds almost as good as the real thing but a clunky interface. iZotope’s Iris also requires a great deal of commitment to get the most out of it—and it does very beautiful, exciting things—but will soon be obsolete and unsupported (regardless of iZotope’s best intentions.) To someone like me, those screen shots are true porn, with no socially redeeming value they merely stimulate my prurient interests. They induce antisocial behavior. They promote an id-based withdrawal from human contact.

A beautiful image. But does it really invoke a lifelong commitment?

A beautiful image. But does it really invoke a lifelong commitment?

I would say this image suggests a little more depth but, ultimately, nothing you can build a relationship on.

I would say this image suggests a little more depth but, ultimately, nothing you can build a relationship on.

 

Hardware, as you would suspect, is where real gear lust manifests itself. This is where the true addiction is created, where the victim turns his back on humanity and eventually slides toward homelessness and bankruptcy. I was rescued from this fate by boredom, frustration, and lack of talent.

Even though it’s been 15-20 years since using most of my gadgets I still want to take them out of storage and stroke them, my recorders and samplers (to me, my Roland MkII sequencer is the equivalent of S/M or bondage paraphernalia, for the true aficionado, and does little to stimulate my simple soul). The most cherished of all, like your first exposure to a Playboy pinup (none of the others will ever be as gorgeous), is my Roland MS-1 sampler. It draws me the way the one ring draws Frodo or Gollum (another era’s gear porn, I’d say). (I had a coworker who treated his first cell phone that way, actually stroking it affectionately rather than working…initially it was quite endearing.) I would keep my MS-1 close at all times if I could. It would have shiny spots from continuous stroking. Yes, I take this personally, as a sensuous activity, rather than just a way to impress the other boys.

A Roland MS-1 phrase sampler.

A Roland MS-1 phrase sampler.

A Roland VS-880 digital 8-track recorder. I still dream of sliding those faders though it's been 15 years since I last used it.

A Roland VS-880 digital 8-track recorder. I still dream of sliding those faders though it’s been 15 years since I last used it.

Some bits of gear seem to me so unattractive, as though they’re middle aged and sporting plain white cotton, that I ignore them despite the lasting reality under the banal façade. Preamps have always had this blandness to them, to such an extent that I did without for almost ten years. Yet a preamp is something deeply satisfying, kind of a matter of true love that outlasts any false promise of gear porn. It’s something so basic, like that lead holder I mentioned a long time ago. It gives your recordings the foundation on which the wilder elements can reside. It’s like marrying your best friend and having the best sex you ever could have imagined, because you have a rapport. As I stated earlier, not everyone can be happy with that. They keep looking in the catalogs and browsing the stores, not able to take their eyes of that deluxe, unobtainable model, ignoring what they have in hand, imagining their recordings are inferior because they don’t have the best and most desirable.

I've had a different preamp (a Bellari MP-105) that was adequate but too strongly flavored. The Bluetube can keep your signal clean or, when you use the tube to add distortion, produce a discreetly fuzzy tone. Not everyone likes the subtlety of the transformation. I suppose if I had unlimited funds I'd want something premium but the Bluetube does a good enough job that I no longer think about replacing it.

I’ve had a different preamp (a Bellari MP-105) that was adequate but too strongly flavored. The Bluetube can keep your signal clean or, when you use the tube to add distortion, produce a discreetly fuzzy tone. Not everyone likes the subtlety of the transformation. I suppose if I had unlimited funds I’d want something premium but the Bluetube does a good enough job that I no longer think about replacing it.

 

Sorry if you wanted me to linger on the pro gear. I really can’t do that. So much of my life has been at or only slightly above the poverty line that I’ve learned to settle for a cheaper, earthier smut. In fact, in recent years I feel so little pull in this direction that I’ve almost convinced myself that I’ve overcome gear lust. (Take a look at the ads in Tape Op , they’re beautiful. Subscribe, it’s free and a great resource for anyone who needs to plug in a microphone.)

I’ll leave you with the one piece that haunts my dreams and makes me sneak glimpses on the internet when no one is looking. It’s a Heil Sound PR-40 microphone. It’s only $327. I could afford it. If nothing else, a few weekends’ overtime would buy it. I’m too cheap. Really, I’m not convinced my Røde NT-1 is inadequate and I’m enough the child of wartime scarcity and the Great Depression (my grandparents, though my father is the same) and the self-sufficiency of homesteaders that I can’t bring myself to replace something that’s not broken. So, I keep looking online when I think no one else can see me.…The sight of it has almost convinced me that my voice would be better and, therefore, my poetry would improve. Indisputable fact.

And if I bought it, then what? Would there be anything left—accept reality!—to excite me?

Heil Sound PR-40 with shock mount and pop filter, known as a great vocal/voice over mic. The one piece of gear that I still lust after.

Heil Sound PR-40 with shock mount and pop filter, known as a great vocal/voice over mic. The one piece of gear that I still lust after.

 

 

 

 

 

Romanticizing Hardship

Posted in A Day in the Life, Memoire, Perception with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , on April 11, 2015 by swampmessiah

I’m going to start out by offending a lot of people: I hate vinyl. That is, I think LPs are a crap way to distribute music. I want to hear the music, not the medium. And in the reality of records on vinyl, you’re not really hearing the medium so much as the wear and tear, the breakdown and disintegration, of the medium.

Recently a discussion with a coworker, Scott, brought me around to extensions of this subject. We were talking about another coworker who has jumped on the vinyl bandwagon. To me it’s nothing but a thoughtless fashion (are you really using your ears?). Scott had a different take on it. He thought the person under discussion was romanticizing vinyl.

(I need to clarify a few things about my impatience with this current fashion for vinyl. Of all the ways music has been marketed vinyl LPs have the best packaging. Nothing else has come close to the esthetic experience of opening a new record: the glorious artwork; the perfume of petroleum products as you break the shrink wrap seal and spread open the sleeve; the slight release of static electricity as you pull out the disk; the moment of reading the grooves, hints of the volume and tempo of the songs before you’ve even heard a note. Also, I began acquiring records about fifty years ago, kept it up until 1990 when I bought my first CD player: I have no particular attachment to the CDs as objects. With CDs, I just like the clarity of the music; I feel I’m closer to experiencing what the artist intended. But I’m extremely nostalgic about my LP collection (somewhere around 2000 records) and I could never bring myself to get rid of them. I just don’t want to listen to them if I can hear another version of the music.)

Part of my record collection.

Part of my record collection.

 

Likewise, I have no love of analog over digital. The best argument against digital, whether it’s in, say, photography or audio, is that those using digital cannot commit to a capture. They keep shooting photos or recording multiple takes of a musical performance without committing to a final version. That, to me, seems more a bad habit than a necessity. A total botch should be discarded while a quirk of performance might be the hidden gem. If you know your tools, work quickly and decisively. Anything else is laziness.

The discussion with Scott got me thinking about a few other things I’ve had to live with that others have romanticized.

Wood burning stoves. I’ve lived in places only heated by a wood burner and it’s dreadful. If you are rich enough or industrious enough to have an efficient wood burning system it’s not totally ridiculous. In my experience it’s a fall back for people who might have some time or friends but no cash. Cutting firewood is back breaking work. If you’re doing it at the proper time of year, when the sap is not flowing, it’s damned cold work (think of Minnesota in January). As I said, chances are you won’t have an efficient stove or furnace (a whole other way of using wood). In my experience you get the fire blazing before going to bed—it could be well over 100º F—and below freezing by the time you wake up. That is, ice on the wash basin (possibly frozen pipes if you have running water, which I didn’t). Most of your plants will dry out and die by the former and your cacti will freeze from the latter (yes, I’ve killed a cactus).…I hadn’t even mentioned the smoke in your eyes and lungs, how it buries itself in all your clothes as a constant olfactory reminder, if you have any trouble getting your kindling to ignite or a weak draft up the chimney. Worst of all, I find a wood stove or fireplace to be little more than waste, vital BTUs going up the chimney.

Another romantic fantasy is the oil lamp. I won’t linger on this. Very simply, your eyesight will go to hell. If the wicks aren’t properly maintained you’ll also have burning eyes and respiratory distress from the fumes. It will no longer be a cozy pleasure to curl up with a good book because you’ll have a headache from the eye strain (and maybe the fumes). Put down your 19th Century illusions and read on.

To me a crazier and more destructive fantasy is the fetish for typewriters. At one point in my life I had a manual. (I was thinking I also had an electric typewriter but the manual was an old office machine with a slickness of appearance that always made it seem more modern than it was.) In the late 1980s I gave up writing because pen and paper or typing made the revision of texts too laborious to seriously pursue. I am not by nature someone who thinks my every word is precious and therefore must not be changed—in fact I’m just the opposite, a compulsive tweaker—yet, while I was writing, left my work as is because the editing process was too difficult (I’m a sloppy typist and would have needed buckets of white out). I didn’t resume writing until I bought a word processor, probably in 1992—crude, with only a few lines visible on the tiny screen, but vastly superior.

Where I may seem to totter or even slip over into the fashion of idolizing difficulty is with traditional media such as sculpture or oil painting or playing unamplified musical instruments. I admire craft. Also, I enjoy the sensuality of these media and tools. There is nothing comparable in digital art to an impasto brush stroke or the bite of a chisel—the best you can create is the illusion. Likewise, there is nothing to compare to the layers of glaze, the other textures of stroke of pen, pencil or brush, the indentations of marks on paper and the tangibility of canvas (again, only the illusion). I know of nothing quite like the experience of holding a mandolin in your hand, of pressing your finger tips into a string, the resistance of a plucked string. The digital world cannot accommodate the sensual experience of playing a traditional instrument. Regarding music, the finished product, I don’t really care how it’s made…as long as we’re talking about recordings. Sitting in a room with a bluegrass band or string quartet, now that’s a different experience. There’s nothing electronic that can give your ears the subtlety of that moment, the intricate details of space and time.

So, yes, I like a wood fire almost as much as anyone else. But I can’t forget what it took to acquire that wood. Nor can I forget the frustration of editing on a typewriter (and, seriously, is there anything more “real” about the written word if you’ve used archaic technology?). Nor am I a musician so I prefer the compositional flexibility of working in the box, as the process of working in a computer is called.

When I was twenty I fantasized about building my own house, whether a log cabin or from purchased lumber, on five acres of land I could have had if I’d put it to use. And I actually started researching and planning the construction of a gypsy wagon. By no means do I wish to imply I’m immune to crazy romantic notions. But I have no patience for fools who try to rationalize their fantasies and insistently argue that it’s somehow better than a more high tech solution.

If you have work to do you use the tools at hand to the best of your ability. If you are more comfortable using hand tools than power tools, use them. But don’t try to justify their superiority. It may be an esthetically, sensually more satisfying experience. But they aren’t superior tools. The resultant object is no more real than something made with more modern tools.

And, I’ll say it again, as a means of distributing and replaying music, vinyl is crap.

Top Ten Records

Posted in Art, Friendship, Memoire, Music, Perception with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on March 21, 2015 by swampmessiah

If you have this dog-like sniffing ritual of checking out the record collection of anyone the first time you’re in their home you might find yourself reading this even though you don’t give a shit about my tastes in music. It’s something you can’t stop yourself from doing. It’s how you try to understand other people and seek out friends. Even if you think I’m an idiot and you hate my taste in music, you’re going to want to know exactly what kind of idiot I am. It’s a way of gauging enemies as well as friends. It’s how you guard your gate. It tells you how far to let someone in.

Record collectors who are in it for the money might go through a similar ritual but their motives are different and the end results are different. People like you and I know that a large percentage of our psyche is on the shelf. Our thoughts and feelings and beliefs have been expressed in music and we can remember who we are just by strolling through the collection.

I have approximately 2000 LPs (I stopped buying vinyl in 1990 when I got my first CD player—I hate vinyl) and maybe 1500 CDs that are not duplicates of the vinyl collection. It’s only in the past year that I’ve been downloading music (I’m still not sure if I like that but I’ve run out of space). One of the peculiarities of this list and discussion is that it is limited to rock. For the past 35 years I’ve been losing interest in rock and pop, heading toward classical, jazz, ambient, both pop and folk world music, (I hate to say this) new age or ambient, electronic, experimental. Another peculiarity is that bands or musicians who are favorites might not have produced favorite albums. They might always be interesting and often good, or consistently good, but never quite there (that’s how I feel about David Cronenberg’s films, which are spotty, often outright failures, but almost always interesting, or Ridley Scott’s, which are pretty consistently good but seldom outstanding).

I’m working off a list I compiled through the process of elimination sometime in 2010. It does not reflect my current idea of my top ten but it probably didn’t the day after putting the list together either, since this is a very fluid and subjective process. By 2010 I had almost stopped buying new music and would rarely listen to the records I already had. Then in the summer of 2014 I decided, first, to get a bunch of Beatles’ albums, making my partner wonder if someone else had taken my place or if I was demon possessed or had an alien in my brain—I have often claimed to hate them. Not true: I just think they’re ridiculously overrated. For the hell of it I put these albums on my computer. Except for my own recordings I’ve never had music on my computer unless it was a temporary thing, for instance as I’d digitize vinyl. Then I obsessively uploaded about 2000 CDs onto my computer. And since then I’ve probably downloaded at least 75 more. Now I am again listening to music. Compared to what I did when I was young I still hardly ever listen to music. But compared to what I’ve done since getting into a relationship 30 years and ago and then becoming a parent (1991) (and working a fulltime day job, et cetera) I am again listening to a lot of music. It’s the first time since the turn of the century that I’ve been exploring new music.

There are only two albums that have been consistently and indisputably on my top  ten records list, which vacillates between five and twenty-five, for the past 35 years or more: Funhouse by The Stooges and Caravanserai by Santana. So let’s just consider them my top two.

I first heard Funhouse when my cousin bought it, sometime after the release of Raw Power, maybe in 1973 or early 1974. When he started college in the fall of 1973 my cousin for the first time in his life had money to buy new music. And a place to find it, on campus. At that time we were both into all hard rock and the beginnings of heavy metal. The Stooges were something else. Nothing, absolutely nothing, had that intensity. Nothing else felt that real or serious or had that sense of commitment. At the time I only liked the first side of the album. Now I almost prefer side 2. “Dirt” is one of my life’s theme songs and probably needs to be played at my funeral.…Iggy’s The Idiot has hovered near my top ten over the decades. Raw Power and Lust for Life are great but I’ve never liked them quite as much. Too many of his records just sound like imitations of The Rolling Stones, such as The Stooges’ first album or his collaboration with James Williamson, Kill City. On the whole I don’t find him all that interesting.

When I was in high school, in the early 1970s, Santana were very big, especially with the stoners. I think it was as close to a spiritual moment as many of us would have. Anybody with any kind of hipster musical credibility, though, probably stopped listening to them after their third album. There were already signs that they were straying from their Caribbean roots and the rock and soul of the first couple of records. Caravanserai took us to Brazil, into jazz, and was probably not that popular. I don’t know, I never hung out with music freaks, except for my cousin. And he never hung out with any music freaks except for me.…I am still very fond of Abraxas and the third album, feel some nostalgia for the first, but can hardly listen to anything after Caravanserai. When I first heard it, after stealing it (when I was 15 I stole about 85 LPs then quit before I got busted), my response was luke warm. It was certainly too mature for me (this was the height of Alice Cooper, T. Rex, Led Zeppelin, Uriah Heep). By the end of the decade it was my favorite Santana album and one of my favorites by just about anyone. Carlos’ solo and collaborative albums never made much of an impression and the earlier albums have been drifting from consciousness but Caravanserai remains, beautiful and dreamy and always finding a way into my blood.

For Christmas in 1967 (I was 10) my cousin and I were asked what record we’d like for a present. I chose Look Around by Sergio Mendes and Brazil 66. He chose The Doors’ first album. I was oblivious and The Doors meant nothing to me. Maybe in 1968 I saw The Doors on American Bandstand, or some such show, and I hated them. I thought Morrison looked like he was praying as he clung to the mic. Yet in 1969, after my parents’ divorce, my father gave me The Soft Parade for my twelfth birthday. And with birthday money I went out and bought Waiting for the Sun (the first record I’d gotten with my own money). Since then I’ve been a Doors fan. Some years or decades an ardent one. Some years, as I’ve been for the past decade, rather fair weather. Yet most of the past 35 years that first album has been hovering in or close to my top ten. The posthumous release An American Prayer has been the single most influential album I’ve ever owned, one that eventually propelled me to recording my own poetry and audio compositions, even though it’s a rather cheesy affair by a not-so-great band both honoring and seemingly cashing in on the words of their dead singer. Over time I’ve come to see Morrison as a mediocre poet, at best, but for years he was the only person I could attach the word poet to. He’s the one who inspired me to write my own poetry. For that, I give thanks.

I first heard Hawkwind when I found Hall of the Mountain Grill in the post holiday cutout bin, January 1976. They were an immediate favorite. The hint of metal with a residue of psychedelia combined with the sci-fi lyrics (it’s possible I’d already discovered Michael Moorcock’s novels), the relentless rhythm and whooshing synthesizers—really, an immediate favorite. It took me at least till the end of the decade to round up all their earlier releases plus what was current (finding several as imports in San Diego, spring of 1980). I remember loaning Space Ritual to a coworker in 1979. He was a Jehovah’s Witness and though he liked metal he had to take this off his turntable because of the paganism. At that time it wasn’t yet my preferred Hawkwind album but it seemed to define them better than the others, which is why I’d chosen to lend it. Almost all that they did between Lost in Space and Hawklords’ 25 Years On is magnificent, in a lowbrow way. They are wonderfully, sincerely idiotic (I doubt they consider themselves idiots but they are). Space Ritual has usually been my favorite and hovering in or near my top ten for the past 30 years or more. Hall of the Mountain Grill, Quark, Strangeness and Charm, and 25 Years On also hover close to that top ten. You will probably notice a paucity of fun in my selection but Hawkwind qualify as fun, I think (since fun is something I’ve never understood—at least by anyone else’s definition of it—I could be wrong). The Doors turned me onto a dark and serious path at a young age. Hawkwind are something of an antidote.

Christmas 1969 was the jackpot for my record collection, as small as it was. It was a long time ago and my memory is vague, so I might have gotten something the preceding year. Whatever. Let’s pretend I know what I’m talking about. The story I’d heard from my mother (in rather catty tones) was that my aunt had married such an old-fashioned Catholic that he wouldn’t allow rock music in the house. She had to part with some records and I received ABC/Dunhill’s A Treasury of Contemporary Hits (Steppenwolf, The Mamas and the Papas, The Grass Roots, and others), The Mamas and the Papas’ Deliver, and Three Dog Night’s Suitable for Framing. The real winner, a used copy given to me by a younger aunt, was Creedence Clearwater Revival’s Bayou Country. That record got a lot of play then and has remained on my turntable, in my CD player, and on my computer ever since. At times I’ve preferred Cosmo’s Factory and gave Pendulum quite a go but Bayou Country is the one I’ve always come back to. Until I crossed paths with Black Sabbath in early 1972 (Paranoid) CCR had been my top band. (I saw them that spring on their last American tour, after Tom Fogerty had left the band. It was so disappointing. Not that they didn’t try. They did everything they could to put on a good show. But they were touring Mardi Gras, the one album of theirs I’ve never liked. Doug and Stu were doing some of the vocals. John Fogerty, at least, had moved on from the ripped jeans and flannel shirts of 1968 and was dressing like a polyester cowboy. I had already begun to move on musically but that concert was a blow from which I’ve never fully recovered.)

Emerson, Lake, and Palmer. Yes, bloated prog rock. While I was in high school I was probably like everyone else in preferring the heavier Tarkus and Brain Salad Surgery to the milder Trilogy. The first album had some sort of honor of precedence but was too classical for teens. Over the years Emerson, Lake, and Palmer has been my favorite though I’m sure I wouldn’t have said much of anything about liking them in the ’80s. Prog was pukingly passé. Actually, even then I liked the first album.…I saw them perform sometime toward the implosion, either touring the second Works album or Love Beach. They were very disappointing. Not that they played badly or put on a bad show but you could tell they were not happy playing together. The new music didn’t resonate with the audience and they were just going through the motions.…Since compiling this list it’s possible I’ve come to prefer Trilogy to all their other albums. I listen to it fairly often. I’ll stand by the first one and Trilogy no matter what any of us think of prog.

When did Jethro Tull’s Stand Up become a favorite? I remember bringing it to my cousin’s house circa 1978 and making an ass of myself. I thought the song “Fat Man” was in praise of girth—my cousin’s always been a pretty stocky guy, like Gary Farmer in Powwow Highway—while playing it for him I realized it was just the opposite. When I crawled under a rock I took the record with me and kept listening to it.…I was introduced to them by the same kid, a family friend at the time, who had introduced me to Black Sabbath, spring of 1972. He loved Benefit, which I heard several years later and never quite liked. The first Tull album I heard was Aqualung and for many, many years it was my favorite by them. It was the album I always pulled out when we’d have our first snowfall (my partner still throws out that opening riff on this occasion and, oddly, now likes the record more than I do) so it’s sort of an October album. Or, rather than Christmas records, I’d listen to Aqualung all December. Shortly after being introduced to the band I got a copy of Thick as a Brick, which my schoolmate hated. It remains a favorite with me. But over the years Stand Up has been the Tull album that I need to hear with some regularity. Aqualung, Living in the Past, Thick as a Brick and, most of all, Stand Up are my Tull albums. I’ve found many of their other albums repellent, and not just in retrospect.

Talking Heads’ Remain in Light has been in my top ten about as long as anything. I couldn’t tell you which of their albums I heard first. Maybe Fear of Music. It probably wasn’t until 1980 that I really started to listen to them. If I’d heard either of the first two albums I hadn’t liked them; I acquired a taste for them after going crazy for the third and fourth. Speaking in Tongues is the Heads’ album that I listened to the most, when it was current, because it was good to dance to though I didn’t like it as much as Remain in Light. Now I can’t stand it. Even when I’m having one of those years where I have no patience for David Byrne’s voice (or his personality) I know that I still love Remain in Light and want to have it near me the way I have monster models and books of poetry. I am comforted knowing the record exists.

In the 1970s I was not a fan of David Bowie. Back in high school I’d acquired a used copy of The Man Who Sold the World and was genuinely fond of it but could not stand anything else I’d heard. There’s something about his presence, what seems a mixture of self-consciousness and vanity, that I find repulsive. But it was his music I didn’t like. None of the Ziggy period. Diamond Dogs seemed awful at the time. Young Americans and Station to Station did not appeal to the lingering metalhead I was. I’m not really sure why my cousin and I were listening to Low not long after he’d first gotten it, whether I’d asked to hear it or if he thought I might be interested. I did not like Low, at all. Ten years later I finally got my own copy with the expectation that I would finally like it, which another ten years later I did. Very slowly my opinion of Bowie began to change. It wasn’t until Scary Monsters that I came to appreciate a Bowie album while it was current. And I soon came to enjoy Lodger in part because of Adrian Belew. Since then I’ve really come to admire the Berlin trilogy with Low being my favorite. The Man Who Sold the World has also hovered around my top ten in recent decades. Aladin Sane has become a regular on my playlist, especially the title song (which seems a definitive Bowie moment). I’ve generally come to like all the old records. His work from the 1980s, whether it’s his solo stuff or Tin Machine, has generally left me cold, except for an occasional song. Starting with The Buddha of Suburbia I’ve liked pretty much everything he’s done. Of those albums Outside has hovered around my top ten. There are very few artists I admire and respect as much as David Bowie though I still go through long spells where I can’t stand to listen to him. There is still something about him I find disconcerting and chilling.

I don’t remember when I first heard Jean Michel Jarre’s Oxygene. I do believe in love at first listen. Usually it wears off fast: an album or song will be played many times a day, dozens of times a week, hundreds of times in that first six months or year or whatever. Then you can no longer stand to listen to it. I’ve had many of those obsessive musical flings since the late 1960s. I think part of what made the affair with Jarre last the rest of my life (at least, I don’t think I’ll dump him) is that at first Oxygene was unobtainable. I could not afford a new copy and no one was parting with theirs (or the used copy was snapped up before I could find it). I think many of his early fans wanted a monogamous relationship and they meant it to last forever and clung to him. I don’t know when I finally got my own copy. It’s never been quite the heady affair of a genuine fling. The album isn’t like the princess in a fairy tale or that woman you met while on vacation. This is something you can live with. Like my copy of Rilke’s Duino Elegies, I can feel peace just knowing it’s there on my shelf. It’s only in the past decade or so that I’ve taken to exploring the rest of his music. Most of it is good, though a little schlocky, but none of it has won me over the way the Oxygene has (I tend to think of the sequel as the same record—Jarre has an odd way of coming back to things decades later as though he still thinks and feels as he did, able to make an extension/sequel to the original, able to re-perform and rerecord the original).

When I lived in Duluth, until 1984, our little slice of counter culture (often of the seedier parts) was Downtown Book where they sold records and books, new and used, and posters, pot pipes, incense, and I forget what else. For about a year it seemed like every time I came into the store someone was playing this really odd and somewhat obnoxious record: Dub Housing by Pere Ubu. Eventually I came to like it enough to buy a copy. It was over ten years before I met anyone else who liked them. Their other albums were good (I really like New Picnic Time, too, which I didn’t get until about ten years after release). When they reformed in the late ’80s I was disappointed. The new Ubu was dull, rather conventional sounding except for David Thomas’ voice. (It was at that time that I saw them at First Avenue, with Peter Blegvad opening. Cloudland was their new album. Very disappointing. What I got out of that evening was Blegvad. The Naked Shakespeare is pretty good.)

Another album that almost immediately won me over and has, usually, continued to lay claim to my…I’m not really sure what it claims of me. My belief in it? Echo and the Bunnymen’s Heaven Up Here. In the spring of 1980, a few months before my 23rd birthday, I moved back into my mother’s house (stayed until October, 1984). At the time I viewed it as something of a curse but in retrospect I remember the luxury of having time to explore so many fields of thought and to develop my art. I also occasionally had an opportunity to earn money (usually working for my neighbor, hauling concrete blocks and mixing mortar when he needed an extra grunt), which meant that for the first time in my life I could sometimes afford a new release instead of always having to wait for a second hand copy.…I think Heaven Up Here was the first thing I heard by the Bunnymen. Crocodiles never quite did it for me. It always seemed too stiff, like they couldn’t be themselves in the studio on that record. I wanted to like Porcupine but it seemed bogus (and to my ears, now, the mix is awful). Ocean Rain seemed like pretentious shit and I simply gave up on them. So many bands of that era had charm when they were bad, maybe because they seemed earnest like good little amateurs. It seemed like something anyone could do (that whole punk and post-punk DIY credo, though it antedates punk). When they went in for cleaner production and a slicker sound they rarely fared well. Most of them lacked the talent to write good songs or to play them well enough to make me come back for more (Psychedelic Furs were possibly the most embarrassing example of this…and you’re wondering why I would have bothered with any of them, as though I should have known better).

 

AA drawing three times life size on Rieves BFK, graphite with touches of India ink, chalk, and white acrylic paint. The article is from Rolling Stone. This drawing is one of the few of my works to be seen in a public exhibition, spring of 1985, at the Duluth Art Institute. I can't recall for certain but it might have been featured in the local newspaper. Gendron Jensen was the star of the show, though not an active participant, but this drawing made a small stir because of the craftsmanship.

A drawing three times life size on Rieves BFK, graphite with touches of India ink, chalk, and white acrylic paint. The article is from Rolling Stone. This drawing is one of the few of my works to be seen in a public exhibition, spring of 1985, at the Duluth Art Institute. I can’t recall for certain but it might have been featured in the local newspaper. Gendron Jensen was the star of the show, though not an active participant, but this drawing made a small stir because of the craftsmanship.

 

Magazine were close to the end when I finally stumbled upon them (after the first half of the 1970s, when my cousin was often leading my musical taste with his new discoveries, I was usually on my own…I came to love the adventure of exploring the record stores, seeking out new and interesting things…either way, it was rare I’d find or could afford a record when it was current). The Correct Use of Soap was not as cool and exciting as any of the other bands I was finding at the time but the music was so solid and the lyrics clever and humorous enough to keep pulling me back (now that I’m becoming an old man the wit seems lacking). Twenty years later Magic, Murder and the Weather had also won me over, sometimes becoming my preference over The Correct Use of Soap. “Song from Under the Floorboards” needs to be played at my funeral. It seems like a condensation of Dostoevsky’s Notes from Underground, the only one of his works that has meant anything to me.

With her annual bonus, near the close of winter 1994, a few months after we’d purchased a duplex with a friend, my partner bought us plane tickets and a room on the beach of Playa del Carmen, Mexico. It has been my only vacation out of the country and certainly my only vacation as a rich American (I was shit broke but compared to the poverty I saw down there I was disgustingly well off). We were browsing in this very upscale gift shop, all local artisans, run by a German (handmade papers and books as art objects, ceramics and sculpture, et cetera). On the stereo was this music like I’d never heard before. We split the cost of the CD, since neither of us, by then, had much money left (well, I was nearly out of credit): Jorge Reyes, Bajo el Sol Jaguar. After tracking down more of his music (still not easy to come by) I found that the album was more like his collaborations with Steve Roach and Suso Sáiz (as Suspended Memories), who both feature on Bajo el Sol Jaguar, than it does any of his other works. Usually his work is less New Age and more quasi-anthropologically pre-Columbian.

Mike Oldfield has been one of my favorite artists since I first heard Tubular Bells. I was aware of it being used in The Exorcist but I’m almost certain that I didn’t see the film until several years after its release. Are you sick of Tubular Bells? It seems Oldfield’s fans can’t let go of it. Nor can Oldfield, he’s reworked it so many times. Back in the 1970s the album I liked was Ommadawn, which I did not own until I bought the very expensive import Boxed, maybe in 1980 or 1981, and that album has hovered near my top 10 ever since (some of the recordings on the fourth LP, stuff he did with David Bedford, are what I really got out of that collection). Most of his albums were pretty good though becoming progressively cheesier until he started doing pop songs (as on Five Miles Out and Crises) and more or less gave up on instrumental music for awhile. That was as far as I could go with him until the mid-1990s, after getting the Elements box set. I gave Songs from Distant Earth a try. I think he has always had an attraction to schlock and that album characteristically has some pretty nauseating moments. But it’s freakishly beautiful as well. Nothing he has done since compares and, really, none of his earliest recordings do either. It is the one Oldfield album that I unequivocally like. Otherwise, I often find listening to him to be a guilty pleasure, as though I had on Enya or Enigma.

Back in the 1990s I was excited by the apparent freshness of electronic dance music: Future Sound of London, Orbital, Underworld, and The Orb to name some of them who didn’t very quickly get bogged down in a stylistic rut and among the few I still listen to from time to time. Underworld’s Dubnobasswithmyheadman has remained something of a magical release—that is, I still hear it as such. In the past twenty years it has become one of my most played records, at a time when I’ve come to listen to less and less music.

Also from that era, though something I didn’t track down until a couple years ago, is Node. I first heard them on a sampler of some sort, probably from a record label or magazine. Their eponymous album (1995?) was an analog synth throwback, totally fetishistic, and totally magnificent. It came across as the one great Tangerine Dream album that we all knew they could do but was never released (Tangerine Dream circa 1975, maybe). (If you listen to Node’s second album, 2014, you’ll hear parts reminiscent of many ’70s synth pioneers such as Jarre, Kraftwerk, and Synergy. An excellent album but not quite like the first.) Node seems totally derivative yet somehow original. I can live with that, especially since it’s better than what it was aping.

It was probably in 2004 that a coworker gave me a couple CD samplers of various metal bands, most of them death metal since that was his thing. I can’t say I disliked much of it but neither did any of it excite me, except for Opeth. The material from Blackwater Park, Deliverance, and Damnation is incredible—all of it produced by Steve Wilson of Porcupine Tree. As metal became formulaic toward the end of the ’70s (think of Judas Priest) I began to lose interest and hadn’t really listened to much since then (though a different coworker tried to reignite my interest 1989-1990…he did get me to reevaluate King Crimson and to pay attention to David Torn). Damnation is such a beautiful album, embodying much of what I like about progressive rock without taking on the mannerisms (unlike Opeth’s last album, Pale Communion, which I can’t listen to, sounding like someone who doesn’t understand the exploratory spirit of prog but merely imitates the mannerisms). I can put Damnation on and listen to it over and over the way I did, say, Dark Side of the Moon or Led Zeppelin’s fourth when I was a kid. That has rarely happened in recent decades.

Something missing from this list are non-rock albums such as Perotin by The Hilliard Ensemble, Current Circulation by David Hykes and the Harmonic Choir, Fauré’s Requiem conducted by Michel Corboz (I prefer it with a boy soprano, though Fauré probably meant it to have an adult female), or Bach’s cello suites performed by Yo Yo Ma. In part this is because my record database was not very accommodating to classical records. Also this represents a mind rut that often precludes me from looking beyond certain parameters. I would probably add all four recordings to my top ten (bringing it to twenty-two, I think).

Also missing are some recent additions. I’m not sure they entirely belong here. I haven’t had enough time to live with them and they could soon overstay their welcome. Two records that immediately come to mind are Farewell Poetry’s Hoping for the Invisible to Ignite and Talk Talk’s Laughing Stock (which is only slightly better than Spirit of Eden and Hollis’ solo, all three of which are superb).

I’m not really sure how I came across Farewell Poetry, if it was serendipity or if someone suggested I give them a try. The general reaction when I’ve tried to pass them on to others has been ambivalent. It is only in the past few months that I’ve come to realize that Farewell Poetry’s music could be described as stylistically banal: they play a very familiar style of post-rock reminiscent of MONO. With an overlay of poetry (and maybe no one liked the poetry). The general business of mixing music and poetry has been my passion for decades so just about any attempt at expanding the field is something I welcome. Also, I like the record. A lot. I generally like post-rock (though it quickly becomes tedious), especially liking the cloying beauty of their sound (as I like MONO’s records), and I am enamored with Jayne Amara Ross’ words and voice. The album brings to mind what I wish I could have heard forty-five years ago, what The Doors and Velvet Underground offered but couldn’t deliver.

Australian poet David McCooey (who, by the way, has an excellent album of poetry and music on iTunes called Outside Broadcast) introduced me to Mark Hollis and Talk Talk. Over the past decades I’ve been pulling away from the song as an interesting structure. I still like songs but I don’t find them all that exciting or inspiring. So, to hear Mark Hollis doing songs that are not in that structural pop rut, are only very loosely related to pop music as we usually hear it, made me an instant fan. Farewell Poetry might not last among my top ten, or even among my top fifty albums but I’m almost certain these three Talk Talk/Hollis albums, especially Laughing Stock, will remain. Like Opeth’s Damnation, these albums reference so much that I was at home with from the 1970s without really copying it—and Hollis extends those ideas without resorting to convention the way Mikael Åkerfeldt invariably does. When it was released, like David Bowie’s Low, I probably wasn’t ready. I think these albums would have seemed to drag. Hearing Laughing Stock now is like instant heaven. I’m at home with how quiet they are. I appreciate the deviance of them. I’m thrilled by the subtlety of the arrangements. I’ve read that the songs couldn’t be performed on stage yet though they’re patched together from hundreds of takes they have an ethereal flow and completeness that seems rare in anyone’s music these days.

Missing from the list and probably my favorite band in the past few years (first heard them in the mid-1990s but didn’t pay much attention until about five years ago) is Einstürzende Neubauten. Many of my recordings resemble their style of industrial music, but with spoken poetry rather than singing, though I have not been directly influenced. Do I have a favorite album by them, something that could be added to my top ten? As a band or artist they might be one of my top five but I can’t think of a specific album that stands out. This is true of many of my favorite artists. They might be consistently good or interesting but maybe never quite great, never pulling together an outstanding album, which has always been a special skill and now a seemingly dying one. I think I mention them just to put the following list and this whole essay into perspective: music I enjoy and admire that never quite reaches the pinnacle of these few others. A continuation of my top ten into a top 50 or 100 or 500 would include albums that have much good material but never quite jell into a wholeness. Well, maybe with this in mind I could probably come up with that top 50 (which would include a few recognized classics, Dark Side of the Moon and Abbey Road and maybe a Kate Bush or two but still primarily albums snubbed by the professional critics and connoisseurs…Argent, Nektar, Pavlov’s Dog, even a Lucifer’s Friend).

 

  1. David Bowie Low
  2. Creedence Clearwater Revival Bayou Country
  3. The Doors The Doors
  4. Echo and the Bunnymen Heaven Up Here
  5. Emerson, Lake, and Palmer Emerson, Lake, and Palmer
  6. Hawkwind Space Ritual
  7. Jean Michel Jarre Oxygene
  8. Jethro Tull Stand Up
  9. Magazine The Correct Use of Soap
  10. Node Node
  11. Mike Oldfield Songs of Distant Earth
  12. Opeth Damnation
  13. Pere Ubu Dub Housing
  14. Jorge Reyes Bajo el Sol Jaguar
  15. Santana Caravanserai
  16. The Stooges Fun House
  17. Talking Heads Remain in Light
  18. Underworld Dubnobasswithmyheadman

Now, are you ready to argue? That’s what fans do best, I’ve heard.

I Brought Home the Gun That Killed Mary

Posted in History, Memoire, Perception with tags , , , , , , on September 13, 2014 by swampmessiah

Yes, I brought home the gun that killed Mary. It’s a Savage 22/410 over and under. Just after my mother’s death (8/29/14) I brought home a few mementoes and things I didn’t want to leave at the house in case of robbery: the gun is both.

It was probably the school year of 1962/63 that my mother decided to send me to Sunday school to get used to being around other children, since I was an only child and we lived in a rural area with a school that lacked a kindergarten. I say “send” because I have few memories of her attending church, though she was a Lutheran. My father never went to church (I still have no idea what his beliefs are; I suspect he believes in god but will have nothing to do with churches).…I would have been five.

There was a girl in the class I liked. Her name was Mary. I have no recollection of what it was that I liked about her or what we did together. I have no recollection of any romantic feelings nor any kind of pre-sexual yearning (not for my peers, anyway). It was probably that she was nice to me. A bigger mystery: why would she have liked me? I seriously doubt I was nice to her. Whatever it was, it was mutual: I have a hazy memory of her laughing face.

Probably that spring or summer, of 1963, we got a second dog. Well, a puppy. I named her Mary.

More than fifty years later I still have a fairly vivid memory of coming out of the house (and I use the term very loosely—it was a tar paper shed appended to a small Airstream trailer) and a very excitable Mary jumping up on me, as she always did. That time she left large welts streaking down my chest from where her claws raked me through my clothes. I cried for a long time, as I always did in those days.

When my father came home my mother told him what had happened and probably said or implied something had to be done.

I remember my father and a gun and Mary walking into the alder and balsam woods surrounding our house.

Mary did not come home for dinner.

End of story.

It seems I have a rather alien view of how you should respond.

A friend blurted out that if he’d known how it would end he wouldn’t finish the book, presuming it were a book, because I let him down. He’s as odd as I am, I suppose. Anyway, he surprised me with his reaction.

The usual response begins with the assumption that I’m revealing something tragic and traumatizing. The listener (and I assume reader) will either give me a blank stare because they’re uncomfortable with such disclosure or they will gush pity and attempted comfort.

The incident is a vivid and sad memory (almost all my memories of childhood are sad—is this me or human nature?). I don’t consider it traumatic. For instance, I don’t hold myself responsible for the death of the puppy. You know, if I hadn’t cried so much maybe Mary would have lived a full dog life. I ‘ve never taken that on. Nor have I blamed my father for brutality. His bluntness of action is one of many ways in which he was intimidating and fearsome to me and I think I had to process his nature when I was young, usually in dreams. But, as I’ve said, I’ve never thought of him as cruel. I have not, in fact or in mind, gone on a tirade about him killing the dog. Maybe if he’d forced me to witness the dog’s death I’d have something to complain about.

The fact is, I was a little slow to put everything together and it probably took me at least a few days to fully comprehend that the dog was dead rather than gone (for instance, that he hadn’t given the dog to a neighbor (in the woods!? my mother would have tried to perpetuate such a scenario and perhaps she did)).

I find the story sad and poignant and have told it or referred to it in poems and memoires over the years. I expect you to have some sort of sympathetic response, both for the puppy and for the child. I certainly don’t expect any kind of comfort for my adult self. (I think there’s a kind of sickness going around, a manipulative self-pity, as some of us have become addicted to being stroked while we cry over our lost days.)

Bringing home the gun brings an indefinable closure to this memory and a completeness to the story. Bringing home the gun and tying it specifically to this one memory gives it a twist of absurdity, a bit of mind-fuck, that will and does provide comfort to my rather alien mind. It turns something sad into something bizarrely amusing.

 

Cabin Fever

Posted in Art, introduction, Memoire, Natural world, Time with tags , , , , , , , , , , on June 8, 2014 by swampmessiah

Abbott Road, about 20 miles north of Duluth, Minnesota, is an old fragment of St. Louis County Highway 4 (locally known as the Rice Lake Road, though it does not go through or past Rice Lake, and in more recent years as the Rudy Perpich Memorial Highway). It is an arc of gravel about a mile and a half long, on the west side of the current highway. In what is to me recent years, sometime since I moved out of the area in 1984, the northern end of the road has been paved because of the boat access to Island Lake cut through the bank of a gravel pit (also something rather recent; when I was illegally riding a motorcycle—under age and without a license—there was nothing but a 50-75 foot tall bank of gravel set off from the road, the trees from the opposite side abruptly stopping where the heavy equipment had stopped digging; the boat access was added sometime between 1975 and 1984, my life or mind had disengaged from the area so I have no clear memory of when this happened). Along the southern end of the road is one side road, at most a quarter mile in length, connecting to the highway, called the West Turner Road (many of the roads in Gnesen Township, where this is and where I grew up, are broken by swamps and therefore have slightly different names for each segment). The northern stretch of Abbott Road crosses Hay Creek (or crick) which, depending on rainfall is either the original creek meandering through a mud flat and swamp grasses or a shallow extension of Island Lake (part of the power company’s reservoir; usually in the winter it’s just a creek, filling as the snow melts, but some years are so dry it never becomes lake, or vice versa never emptying). Just south of West Turner Road, added sometime after 1984, is the crossing of a major snowmobile trail. There are two more side roads jutting off Abbott onto peninsulas where people have leased land from the power company, originally to build cabins but now to live all year round, one just south and uphill from our driveway and the other a little past Hay Creek.

(If you do not know gravel roads, they are rutted and washboard all year, making it difficult to control your vehicle and giving you the sense that you and your car are being shaken to pieces. In the winter they might be impassible because of snow and ice (I’ve seen winters where the snowplow almost couldn’t get through, the drifts were taller than I was). In the spring you might not get through because it’s mud and, just like in the snow, vehicles could get stuck. In the summer, unless it’s just rained or the county road crew has recently poured oil on the surface, no doubt doing wonders to the groundwater that fills everyone’s well, there’s so much dust hanging in the air for the next half hour after a car’s gone by that it’s difficult to breathe and any laundry on the line needs to be washed again.)

A map of Abbott Road in Gnesen TownshipThe leftmost of the three blue dots between the Rice Lake and Abbott Roads is a pond in our north field, or what once was a field (now overgrown with alder shrubs). Something misleading about this map is that it looks like it’s all solid ground between those ponds and where the north end of Abbott Road joins the highway. It’s almost all swamp, depending on how high lake level is: some years the water almost comes into that pasture. Anyway, if you were to drive or walk along Abbott Road where it crosses the creek, you would see open swamp to the east and either open water or mud flats to the west (on the map the western side shows it as open water touching up against the road).

That little road just below the three blue dots is our driveway, and a main point in the essay I’m writing. From the house to Abbott is about the length of a city block. It is lined with Norway pine that were, maybe, fifteen feet tall or a little taller when we bought the place in 1964. The drive itself is two wheel ruts with grasses and mosses growing on the hump between. (Not pertinent to this story but perhaps of interest: the south field, which runs alongside the driveway, had been an airstrip years before, perhaps in the 1930s and ’40s, that ran from Island Lake almost to a low gravel ridge overlooking Highway 4.)

(I also need to make a little geographical detour to explain the land itself. Once you climb over the basalt ridge along Lake Superior—that is, the North Shore—you lose sight of bedrock and river valleys. The landforms are so recent that they have little sign of natural erosion (that is, river valleys). It is glacial debris pretty much all the way across Minnesota, much of it flat, former lake bottom. The area of my youth is moraine, alternating between low hills consisting of gravel and boulders, often hundreds of feet deep and miles long, or low, wet areas. Some of the low ground is genuine bog but most of it is the flowage of very sluggish streams and, therefore, swamp. Some of these wet areas are open enough to be called lakes (our momentarily famed 10,000), all of which are quickly filling in with sediment and vegetation. The larger, cleaner lakes in the area are not natural but, rather, part of the hydroelectric system.)

The point of this essay focuses on the end of that driveway as it empties onto Abbott Road, what you see and what might prefer to see.

In those days, the early 1980s when I was in my mid-twenties, I had moved back to my mother’s house at Abbott Road after a series of personal defeats and humiliations. I did not have a car or any reliable transportation. I did not and could not have a steady job and income without a car. The place, as mentioned in the opening paragraph, is about 20 miles from Duluth. Except for an occasional ride from family or a hitch from strangers (sometimes I’d walk almost the whole way), I was stranded.

Most days I would walk the “neighborhood”, becoming quite familiar with the gravel of the road, the stunted trees (almost alpine or taiga in shortness), the fields and flowers and shrubs, the edges of the lake and swamps, and, in winter, the snow (sometimes I’d lie flat on my back in a field deep with snow and stare at the stars). In those days there were still very few houses, usually of families that had been in the area for several generations, people my parents or grandparents had gone to school with.

It has always saddened me that I’m not a naturalist, one of those cool people who can name all the trees and flowers and small creatures met on such walks. I don’t know of anyone in my youth who could have taught me much and I, in my turn, was of a TV generation.

In the low ground there was tamarack and northern white cedar (in this area it tends to be dominated by tamarack) and a type of ash, probably black or green ash, and occasionally willow. On the higher ground balsam fir, paper birch, popple (aspen), which is something of a weed, shrub alder, various spruce, and as the ground becomes higher and drier and the forest more firmly established, white pine, sugar maple, and all those leafy trees I’ve never been able to identify (basswood, maybe). There is wild blueberry. Pussy willow. Diamond willow (I have a wizard’s walking stick of this, from my Tolkien days of the 1970s). Hazel. Choke cherry.

There are so few of the smaller plants that I can name. In the fields are daisy and devil’s paintbrush and some sort of thistle. By old farms the raspberries have gone wild. Wild strawberries. Ferns. Since I was a kid lupines seem to have spread along the ditches and the edges of fields (I don’t remember seeing them growing wild when I was young, but I didn’t really pay attention to flowers). All kinds of unnamable and possibly unnamed grasses. Horsetail ferns. An abundance of mosses. All the larger rocks and tree trunks are covered with lichens. Puffball is the only mushroom I can name, though we had all kinds, especially on tree trunks.

Along this particular stretch of Abbott Road, running from our driveway down to Hay Creek, I remember horsetails, wild strawberries, devil’s paintbrush, and all those mysterious grasses growing in the sand deposited at the edge of swamp and forest as rain washed it away from the heavier pebbles and stones of the gravel roadbed. In the forest of the higher ground were ferns and mosses and mushrooms; birch, popple, balsam, and the occasional maple. Closer to the creek, in the swampier ground and the overgrown pasture were swamp grasses, alder, and ash. At the edge of the flowage there was pussy willow and cat tails. And probably more alder (it seems ubiquitous).

Not much can be said, by me, about the fauna of the region. The seemingly dominant life forms have exoskeletons and wings. Most obviously, there are mosquitoes. There are the generic flies, which might be houseflies. There are the gigantic, biting horseflies and the gorgeously colored, delta-winged deer flies, which give the most painful bite of all. There are biting gnats and pesky little midges or no-see-ums. And so many colors of lovely damselflies and dragonflies, which frighten children because they’re so big. June bugs to cling on to your window screens for a week early summer and ladybugs in the fall, most of the other beetles going unnoticed by ordinary humans. There are several species of hornet, bee and wasp; numerous moths and butterflies (it seems luna moths are not as common now, or even then, as they were when I was a kid). Of course there were ants: mounds of black or red ants; tiny red ants in rotten wood; great big flying ants (a rare sight and maybe not a separate species). Of course there are other arthropods, especially in the wet soil with the moss and rotting trees, under every stone and deadfall, silverfish, centipedes, and millipedes.

The birds you’d hear and see all the time but I can name only a few: crow, maybe raven, blue jay, grackle, barn swallow, chickadee, cardinal, redheaded woodpecker, and all those little brown things like sparrows and finches. You could always hear the loons from the lake but rarely see them. Other aquatic birds could be found at the creek such as mallards, geese, blue heron, redwing blackbirds, and the occasional kingfisher.

Only two kinds of turtles are common, the painted turtle and the snapping turtle (I’ve been charged at by a one-eyed snapper), and two kinds of snake, the garter and the copper belly, all of which could occasionally be seen at this intersection of driveway and gravel road.

There are several native toads and a couple of species of frog, though leopard frog is the only one you’d readily find (again, there seem very few compared to what we had 50 years ago—I hope it wasn’t because my uncle George and I killed so many that one day in 1966). It’s probably been 50 years since I last saw a salamander. It is my belief that there is a newt native to the area but I can’t recall having seen any.

Except for the very petite chipmunks and red squirrels (most unlike the hulking gray squirrels common to Minneapolis parks), the mammals keep out of sight. Common night visitors are, of course, skunks. Porcupines are shy and rarely seen except for the residue of quills in a dog’s nose. Woodchuck less so, but still rarely seen. Badgers, wolves, foxes, and coyotes are extremely rare but not unheard of. My grandfather claimed to have seen a cougar in the distance, several miles from this particular driveway. Black bear and white tail deer are very common and usually the only large mammals you’d see by day. Moose on the loose could become a draw for the whole township. Rabbits. Rabbits. Did I say fuckin’ rabbits? All kinds of little mice and voles. At the water are beaver and muskrat. The small insectivorous bats are not as common as I’d like them to be.

View down a country road.

The one detail I have definitely left out of this description, perhaps because I find human structures and other artifacts unimportant, is the garage at the end of the driveway. There was a two-car garage on the north side of the driveway, with tar and sand shingles for siding and rolls of tarpaper for a roof. Neither my father nor step-father ever used it for cars; maybe for the temporary storage of a tractor or wood saw (someone had a frame with a Model-A engine and a 30″ blade for cutting logs into firewood). Since I moved out in 1984, the roof caved in under a heavy load of snow and the rest of the garage has collapsed but remains by the side of the road as an eyesore.

By now you might have come to the conclusion that I had a deep connection with the land and simply couldn’t get enough of it. That might be true now. In 1983, the year that I think is the focus of this essay, I was 26, miserably unhappy, desperate to find love and sex (in that order, strange as it may seem), broke, and, as I said, stranded. I had almost no social life and no one in my life who knew or cared about art (except for one very eccentric—or crazy—friend who seems to have been a collection of looped sound bites about what she thought of art and the good life). Especially at night, when I was at my most creative and self-pitying, I wanted to be doing anything but swatting mosquitoes and listening to the dog barking at all those night creatures.

All of this is background to a poem I wrote, probably in 1983 (revised at least once around the turn of the century and maybe again a few years later), called “Heathens in the Trees”.  It was a mad rush of crazy words perhaps not written at this intersection of driveway and gravel road but certainly conceived there. Between 1980 and 1984, while I was a young adult living in Gnesen Township, I think most of what I wrote was a combination of a love affair with words, especially incomprehensible or exotic words, and cabin fever: so much of what I wrote then were wild words.

I will give you both the text and a recent reading of that poem. (If you find it to be nauseating, irritating, incoherent gibberish I sympathize and might even agree with you. If you find it offensive you need to stick with Disney.) It can also be downloaded, pay what you will, as part of a collection, EP and chapbook, at bandcamp.com, called Six Sonnets and Some Wild Words (the title is quite a bit longer than that).

Birds without feather bleed the sky,
bright blue is draining toward black
and all the false stars hover
over the city in the distance.
The ditch grows without frogs,
the weight of their desire spent
and no longer pressing down on the mud,
the tadpoles sucked up and re-ejaculated
like live ammunition in a fast-action porn flick,
the hollow swelling between roots and rocks,
selling its mutant algæ to city fishermen
as bait for river nymphs, limnads
and other titillations that’ve gotten away—
each sportsman wants his rod to be ready this time.
All along the road
where forests threaten civilization,
heathen are nailed to trees
by the unknown judges of the road.
Until they die they eat dust
and rocks thrown by spinning tires.
They drink the liquid excrement of birds.
Their hair is long and dirty
and tangled into deceptive stories.
Their robes are of black wool
begging for fire.
Sap mingles with blood and urine,
draining the ditches dry
as it flows through the rocks
to the center of the earth,
freeing the snakes.

The moon hums radio jingles
while priests cry under the street lamp
and nuns run in circles,
naked but for their pastimes.
We’d join them if we could
but it’s a sacred ritual reserved
only for those whose undergarments
have been blessed for public examination—
no skids, no pee stains, no menstrual blood,
no wasted cherubs who leaked from his holy dick
after that last Sunday’s confessions,
no nocturnal impressions stretching the cotton.
Telephone wires grow taught from distress
as we tell our friends the news.
Every one of us speaks as a prophet
to announce the new polycarbonate age
about to reshape our coffins and beds
so we forget death’s a transition
from prime time to late night—
until the wires overheat with the resistance
inherent in every inevitable apocalypse.
The trees give rhythm to the moon’s song,
like plantation a capella on every beat,
ignoring the heathen pleadings from below,
with a chorus of mad brahmin
hanging in the branches by their toes—
ugly bats to add high harmonic drones,
it makes even the weekend pederast hum along.
Wires snap free!
dancing in worm twists
like all the goddess’ arms swaying chaos
and it’s the end of the world
because it’s the last time you’ll ever get close to her—
she’s mad now and smiling like Kali—
strangling the heathen billboards—
nailed to the burning ash—
forcing vowels from their erratic mouths,
songs gracing their orifices
like a symphony of flatulence
outshining the moon…
until King Sodomy, sixty feet tall
and a red pecker the length of Cadillac hearse
loping in front of his sagging paunch,
dances over the hill just ahead,
legs bowed, eyes green and rolling—
if you don’t adore him he’ll poke your eyes out
and shoot hot semen into the sockets.
On either side, a train of quadriplegics
being towed for his amusement…
A carpet of red and black laughter
spreads from under his magnificent feet
to cover all lands in every direction—
choking heretics and saints
with scalding jizm down their throats,
giving life to whores
and their resplendent cunts,
blessing them as we should all be blessed,
leashing on the world the mythological slut,
the great dream-beast of every man…
and to gigolos learning their trade.
Fire! Fire! Light his ass on fire
and blow-dry the heathens for next christmas!
We want them toasty and clean!
Night screams for release!

A small beggar laughs
and only a puddle remains in the road,
water bugs crawling about his toes,
and wild telephone wires
protruding from his ears, dancing.

https://soundcloud.com/swampmessiah/heathens-in-the-trees

The Beatles

Posted in A Day in the Life, Memoire, Music, Perception on May 10, 2014 by swampmessiah

Today I went on a Beatles CD buying binge. This was odd because I rarely buy music these days—no time to listen to it. It was also odd in that I’ve never been a huge fan of The Beatles.

(For anyone interested in such things, I bought: Rubber Soul, Revolver, Magical Mystery Tour, Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, the white album, and Hey Jude. I already have CDs of Abbey Road and Let It Be. Their earlier recordings have never interested me.)

When I say I wasn’t “a huge fan” you might misunderstand me and assume I didn’t like them at all and never listened to them (or if I did listen it was out of some sort of social obligation to seem cultured). But I did own and listen to some of their records.

More importantly their career in America brackets the more or less conscious period of my childhood and the transition into adolescence.

I can’t recall for certain but I think I’ve written a little about the 1963-64 school year, when I was in first grade (there was no kindergarten), about Kennedy’s death, my great grandmother’s death, the end of Rocky and Bullwinkle, and The Beatles’ first time on Ed Sullivan. Maybe not. Anyway, it was quite an eventful year, even if I wasn’t fully cognizant of it at the time.

Of course I heard them on the radio. If you turned on the radio, there they were. Yet they weren’t what I wanted to hear. Depending on the year, chances are I’d rather have heard Herman’s Hermits or The Monkees. Or maybe it would have been Sergio Mendes and Brazil 66 I was waiting for. Or maybe Donovan. Or Steppenwolf! By the time I was eager to hear more serious rock bands I was, in fact, also listening for The Beatles (“Come Together,” in particular, was the coolest song ever).

In 1970 I was given Let It Be for my birthday or Christmas, I forget which. And a couple years later I was given a used copy of Sgt. Peppers. And later yet I found a used copy of Abbey Road for about 50 cents (that was a lot of money for me in those days). So, yes, I listened to these three albums all through high school, as well as George Harrison’s All Things Must Pass, McCartney’s Ram, and Lennon’s Imagine. Their songs formed a part of my consciousness. In particular, “I Me Mine” from Let It Be has been a nagging challenge for almost forty-five years and remains an essential refrain—if anything, an increasing refrain—in my attempts to understand life and what I want from it.

The most vivid moment I have of The Beatles, though, is their last time on The Ed Sullivan Show. This was not an actual appearance but the playing of clips from the movie Let It Be (was it even released? I can’t remember it). “The Long and Winding Road” and one other song. Or two? Did they show “Let It Be”? Again, memory fails.

…I was twelve-years old. It was early 1970. My parents had divorced the previous winter and, on this day, my mother and I were in Two Harbors at the home of a man she had been dating. Bob. A Norwegian bachelor named Bob. He had taken us out snowmobiling. It must have been inland from town because I have no memory of Lake Superior (I doubt even then there were snowmobile trails along the lake shore, though such places were not as well protected as they are now). We’d been out for several hours and were cold. I think I was given a cup of cocoa and planted in front of the TV while they went into the kitchen for brandy and conversation (here I’m making assumptions about what they might have been doing).

And there they were. The Beatles. Let it be.

Shortly after this strange date we spent the day with some of my father’s family at a tavern they owned on Island Lake, a few miles from home. Again, snowmobiling, this time out on the open fields of ice. After the sun had gone down and we were inside warming up, probably after having had something to eat, my mother became reacquainted with her grade school sweetheart, who was also recently divorced and, that day, getting hammered on brandy sevens (brandy and 7Up).

About five months later, a week before my thirteenth birthday, she and Dick were married.

We never saw Bob again. There was something disturbingly earnest about him. I’ve always had a suspicion that he would have tried to be a good father, like a misguided missionary hell bent to keep me on the right path (whatever it might have been). For all my step-father’s faults—and in most ways he was a pretty serious screw-up—this was a good thing for me. A negligent step-father can be so much better for a kid than an ignorant one.

Of course, this was the land of Lutherans not Catholics, but somebody understood what Mother Mary said to me…

The Greatest Sin

Posted in A Day in the Life, Book commentary, Memoire, Morality, Perception, Social responsibility, Time with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on September 22, 2013 by swampmessiah

My concept of sin is very egocentric: it’s something that is done to me. I suppose that makes me a Libertarian? (Pardon, that was a random association but it rings true. It’s all about the world doing unto them as they go blustering about with their irresponsible sense of self-importance.)

I wasn’t raised in a religious household. In fact, I don’t think the word “sin” was ever used within my hearing, except for the rare occasions when I was brought to a Lutheran church (usually just dumped at the door by my stepfather) until I was confirmed and had my first communion, after that no one cared if I went or not.

So, really, sin is not a part of my consciousness and never has been.

Until recently.

The awareness of being sinned against began to grow while reading a book that had nothing to say, or the author had nothing to say but went on and on trying to impress us otherwise. It was probably nonfiction and probably written by a journalist who read and interviewed but did not investigate firsthand (Diane Ackerman’s Natural History of the Senses versus anything by Mary Roach). Or it might have been something by Sarah Vowell, who seems to know everything but says next to nothing when she writes.

Or it might have been my observations of my children’s educations (which, by the way, have been significantly richer than mine was, at least until they got beyond high school—college seems as pointless as it ever was, but more necessary for getting a job)…the memories of hours, weeks, and years drifting away in a dull haze of boredom and meaningless information.

Or it might have been the very existence of my day job, installing and warehousing office furniture. Or the existence of my clients confined to their cubicles for decades—doing what? Or any of the jobs I’ve had before this one. If one of my goals is to be conscious and aware of my life passing but what I do most of the day barely engages my mind…

To me, the greatest sin is to waste my time.

Let’s Start with the Image

Posted in Art, Memoire, Perception, Social responsibility with tags , , , , , , , , , on September 21, 2013 by swampmessiah
Drawing number seventy-one

LXXI-71 8”× 6” Graphite, india ink, gesso, chalk, and acrylic on cream Rieves BFK
The edge of whiteness,
the edge of pain,
neither in nor out.
The edge of serenity,
the edge of dark,
neither close nor far.
Up—away from the center.
down—toward the center.
…is struggle or flowing,
neither resolute.
The segments are yours.
The harmony will be yours.

This drawing was intended to close my last post, Why Art? By the time I had finished writing, the image seemed unnecessary and maybe even distracting.

It is something I produced approximately twenty-five years ago and is one of the few pieces of my mature art that could be put into a blog: almost everything I’ve done over the past 30 years is sexually explicit and would bring down the wrath of someone or other (actually, it would probably lead to preemptive censorship in an attempt to derail the expected wrath).

As I stated in that post, I draw, write, and record—but especially the drawing, painting, collage, or whatever you want to call the visual product—to process thought. I think on paper. I think with images. If the images seem muddled and inexplicable and meaningless, that reflects my thought process.

In other words, I really couldn’t tell you what this image “means”. Maybe the words written on the sheet clarify things. I seriously doubt it. And if you can read Chinese, again, maybe that would help clarify things. I have to say that the possibility is laughable. I mean, if the English doesn’t make sense would it follow that something cobbled together from an English/Chinese dictionary (designed for missionaries at that!) would make more sense?

Anyway, it seemed that if I am going to talk about art and comment on art and the need to make it and whatever else might be related to the subject I should put myself on the line and let you see what I’m about.

Don’t allow yourself be distracted by the technique, it’s superficial. I find it’s too easy to be wowed by the verisimilitude and the apparent solidity of the drawing. What’s important: does it make you feel anything? Does it make you think? Does it in any way challenge your perception of the world?

Those would have been my goals if I’d been making art, which I thought I was at the time.

Why Art?

Posted in Art, Memoire with tags , , , , , , , , on September 8, 2013 by swampmessiah

At the time of this writing I am 56-years old. I’ve been drawing and painting for most of that 56 years; I’ve been writing for creative purposes for close to 40; and I’ve been recording poetry and other sounds since 1996.

Why?

I’ve been asking myself this question since 1975, when I graduated high school and had to start figuring out what I need to do with my life. I have never wanted to be an artist. Even then I somehow knew that artists had a long hard road to financial success and very little creative freedom if they wanted to make a living of it. Primarily, I knew that I hated drawing or painting when the impetus was someone else’s direction and will: I could only do it when I needed to. I even fail when it’s my own decision to putter around but there’s nothing impelling me to create.

I have never made a living off my art and, in fact, have rarely sold anything (a few pieces for a few dollars, to family or friends, back when I was just learning to paint—1975, 1976, maybe a little later). In the spring of 1983 I had a showing of drawings at the Tweed Museum at UMD and in 1985 was a participant (and instigator, I guess) of a group exhibit of drawing at the Depot, also known as the Duluth Art Institute. In those days art fed my ego and I thought the world needed to see what I had done but I found that I could not do it on my own terms. In public galleries sexuality is generally forbidden and my style was too close to illustration for the commercial galleries. Other than that I’ve pretty much kept it to myself until I started posting my recordings on soundcloud.com in 2011.

So this really begs the question: why?

Most of all, it’s been an important question to me because the only image that could hold my attention has been the human form. More often than not, the female form. And beginning in 1983 the sexual form, after which almost all my drawings and paintings were sexually explicit. Why? Was it just a fantasy projection? Some elaborate masturbatory process? Mundane voyeurism, an excuse for looking at pornography? Was it some magical process of enhancing my virility? Was it cabin fever? Was it simply a lack of imagination, a blatant statement of what’s on the mind of the 26-year old male?

I’m sure every one of those possibilities, and more, have played a small part at some time over the decades.

It’s only now that I have no particular attachment to sexuality, as my libido fades into just another memory, that I’m finally able to see my art for what it is (or, in regard to visual art, was, since I’ve moved on to writing and recording and more overtly cerebral, or less evocatively sensual, matters), coming to the conclusion that the main reason I make things is to think them through. Without getting into the quirks of my upbringing and the split personality of our culture, almost all my art comes down to issues of human contact. It’s an art of the flesh, with the senses being an integral part of the mind (or spirit, if that’s more to your thinking). It’s all about contact and sensual awareness, all of which is electrified by the sexual drive. It’s about people touching each other. It’s about crossing personal boundaries and mentally breaking free of cultural restraints. It’s about feeling alive and being awake. It seems the only way I could process any of this is on a piece of paper: that’s where I do my thinking.

On occasion I go into autobiographical detail in my art, most often in my writing, but even then I tend to avoid realism and present it in a mythologized form. This is not to protect anyone’s feelings or anonymity, because I doubt there will ever be anyone paying attention to what I’ve made. I think getting bogged down in social reality inhibits expression and perception. The social details aren’t the things that matter. They clutter the human experience more than they illuminate it. They keep us from seeing the things that almost all of us feel, the details that unify humanity and show that on a certain level we have more in common than not (and more in common with other living beings of all species).

What I’m saying is pretty much a platitude, a cliché, at least within some social circles. I’ve had to spend most of my life coming to those platitudes for myself and I had to find them one crosshatch or brush stroke at a time. If those do not impress you as great tools for thinking, sorry, but they’re the best I’ve had.

My art and creativity have never been directed by goals. There has never been a need to get somewhere or achieve something, at least not outside the needs of the art itself, such as developing a technique. The same has been true of my life. There is experience and discovery and the slow process of learning. Something nagging at the back of consciousness until I’d pick up a pen or sit down at a keyboard to type, and the lines of graphite or the words or the cluster of sounds or whatever medium I’m working in, would begin to give shape to whatever it was buzzing in my thoughts. It might be vague enough that I have to try several times over, until some other buzz becomes louder or I simply run out of interest and energy, and even then not becoming clear to me for many years. It’s still possible that I don’t understand a thing I’ve made. The point is that I was thinking about it. Understanding, like life itself, is transient. What seems obvious one minute might be gone the next.

For me the thought itself is never direct, never more than a question that needs exploring.

I guess for me what is interesting is giving shape to those questions. I don’t need answers. If there was a time in my life when I did I can’t remember it. This might be a flaw in my character or a failing in my upbringing.

I don’t know…I find it liberating.

First Grade

Posted in History, Memoire with tags , , , , , , , , on July 21, 2013 by swampmessiah

The first day of school—I have no recollection of it.

It was the same building as the one my mother and step-father had attended in the 1940s, four classrooms for grades 1-8, but had the addition of a hallway, with indoor bathrooms and a kitchen, and cafeteria/gymnasium/theater appended sometime in the 1950s. Most of the students were from working class families who had settled in the township a couple generations earlier (my father’s mother had attended a different incarnation of the school in the 1920s). In 1963 there were about 85 students. By the end of the decade all of this would change, with about 120 students, as the area became suburbanized and the people moving in around Island Lake started building what to the rest of us were mansions. Until then, most of the families living around the lakes had houses that began as single or two-room cabins, with bedrooms and bathrooms added on as the families grew (or as indoor plumbing became more common).

Gnesen School

Gnesen School, on the Howard Gnesen Road about 15 miles north of Duluth. View from the west.

In general I have few memories of school, and those that I do have are unpleasant. I was so excited to be able to learn things and to be around other kids, to have playmates, yet both quickly proved to be disappointing.

But that’s not what’s always on my mind from that year.

At no point in my life have I paid attention to what’s going on around me, neither watching television news nor reading papers or magazines. History? Yes. When it’s all done and analyzed I find it fascinating. I think I want a complete story rather than an unfolding and usually dwindling one (which is why I read graphic novels rather than comic books?). The future? Can’t stop imagining it. And it isn’t just current events on the public scale: I know very little about the people around me. I wouldn’t say I’m introverted. Or can one be introverted and still oblivious of one’s own feelings and motives? I tend to find myself as uninteresting as everyone else.

So what was so interesting about first grade?

As mentioned above, I started school in 1963.

That is the beginning of what we later came to think of as the era of dead Kennedys. It meant nothing to me at the time except that we probably had a day off school for the funeral, probably had a TV in the classroom as the news unfolded, and I took interest in my father (one of the school janitors) flying the flag at half-mast. The meaning of the event unfolded for me as I grew older and tainted the rest of the decade and the whole of my childhood.

1964 brought us Beatlemania and the beginning of the British Invasion. That, too, meant nothing to me. It’s probable I saw The Beatles on the Ed Sullivan Show. I think it was broadcast on Sundays and I often went to Kelsey, MN with my grandparents to visit the folks, as my maternal grandmother called her parents, on Sundays (Wild Kingdom, Disney, and Ed Sullivan, I think, all aired Sundays). I have a vague recollection of the adults laughing at their haircuts and the screaming girls (the girls were already screaming then, right?).

Sometime before Easter my paternal grandfather’s mother died (her family had settled in Gnesen circa 1860, though I don’t think my grandfather grew up there…he was born in western Canada and later had a house on 9th Street, just below Skyline, on Duluth’s central hillside, which is where my father grew up). My great grandmother had a house a mile or two west of the school.…I remember relatives coming down from Canada for the funeral. I remember going to Shopper’s City and getting yellow chick Peeps.

I also remember this being the last time I prayed. I’d seen a bag of toy soldiers on a hook at Woolworth’s, blue and gray for the Civil War, which I so badly wanted. I had a moment alone in my maternal grandparent’s basement, looking up along a rough-sawn column to the beam, joists, and subflooring above me (a rather bleak view of Heaven, I recall thinking about it, wanting a view of clear sky) as I fervently prayed for the soldiers. I got what I wanted.…I don’t remember having any profound thoughts but there was obviously something wrong with this, as though God was petty and trivial. I could never again bring myself to pray.

The most devastating event of that year, though I wasn’t consciously aware of it for decades to come because no one around me was conscious of it, I suppose, was the cancellation of Rocky and Bullwinkle. After that I had to watch Underdog. That hit me where it hurt.